A chronology of the public record, with related but distinct proceedings kept separate.
The chronology includes earlier annexation and boundary records because residents have questioned whether they are connected to Project River. Placeward includes the documented sequence while avoiding conclusions about intent that the records do not establish.
City minutes document a 4.93-acre annexation proceeding at 9227 Frontage Road. The record is relevant to the later boundary chronology but does not by itself establish a Project River connection or intent.
Sources: R03
Local growth-boundary changes became part of later community scrutiny. Exact parcel-by-parcel legal effect remains a records-and-mapping question.
Sources: R03
City and county records document a roughly 5.75–5.8 acre Bacon/Bruner / Bruner One annexation matter.
Sources: R04,R05
Bradley County adopted data-center rules that became an important part of later debate over zoning jurisdiction and annexation. Placeward treats motive claims about annexation separately from the documented sequence.
Sources: R20,R23
Project River is publicly described as an approximately 850-acre industrial-energy campus; community meetings are announced.
Sources: R13,R16,R20
The development team presents the concept and answers pre-submitted questions. Local reporting says no data-center operator contract had been signed.
Sources: R21
Open-house format; building-trades supporters emphasize jobs while many residents raise environmental, infrastructure, annexation, and process concerns.
Sources: R22
The Wright family says it accepts the city’s proposed PUD 77 requirements, subject to finalization. The same date, Algorhythm closes a transaction involving Azure Energy.
Sources: R14,R18,R19
The city announces suspension of direct Project River meetings while a third-party engineering review is pursued and says the Sept. 21 Planning Commission meeting is canceled.
Sources: R01
The City of Cleveland’s official Agenda Center and calendar label the Sept. 21 special-called Planning Commission meeting canceled. No Project River vote occurred at that meeting.
Sources: R01,R32
The city annexation page lists a 385.58-acre Wright Brothers Construction request with proposed CG zoning. This proceeding should not be automatically treated as the Project River campus approval.
Sources: R02
The City’s Sept. 18 notice suspended direct Project River meetings while an independent engineering review is pursued. The City’s annexation page separately lists a Sept. 28 hearing for a 385.58-acre Lower River Road commercial annexation. These should not be conflated unless official documents establish that they are the same proceeding.